[Back to Annex Home]



Fund name: T. Rowe Price Africa & Middle East Fund (TRAMX)

Objective: The fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing primarily in the common stocks of companies located or with primary operations in Africa and the Middle East. Their "primary emphasis" for now is on Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Morocco, Nigeria, Oman, Qatar, South Africa, and United Arab Emirates. They’ll add to the list as markets develop and opportunities present themselves. It’s nondiversified and the managers expect to hold 30-40 stocks, many of which may be in the telecom and banking sectors. Price ranks this among their highest expected risk funds.

Adviser: T. Rowe Price. Price was founded in 1937 by Thomas Rowe Price, widely acknowledged as "the father of growth investing." The firm now serves retail and institutional clients through more than 450 separate and commingled institutional accounts and more than 90 stock, bond, and money market funds. The company’s international investment arm T. Rowe Price International is headquartered in London and has offices in Buenos Aires, Hong Kong, Paris, and Singapore. As of March 31, 2007, Price had more than $350 billion in assets under management.

Manager: A team led by Christopher D. Alderson, who has been at Price since 1988 and who also manages T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets. The other managers are Ulle Adamson (who assists with the Media & Telecom fund), S. Leigh Robertson (who took over Emerging Europe from Alderson when this fund launched), and Joseph Rohm (who assists with Financial Services).

Management’s Stake in the Fund: Mr. Alderson has over a million dollars invested in T. Rowe Price funds, including several hundred thousand in his main charge (Emerging Markets Stock) but none in his Emerging Europe & Mediterranean fund. There’s no data available for the other three.

Opening date: September 5, 2007.

Minimum investment: $2,500 for a regular account, $1,000 for an IRA or UTMA account. The minimum is reduced to $50 for folks setting up an automatic investing plan.

Expense ratio: 1.75% after waivers. In general, Price’s international funds end up with below average expenses, per Morningstar. There’s also a 2% redemption fee on shares held fewer than 90 days.

Comments: We should start with the good news. First, you’re not over-invested in Africa and the Middle East now. Many of these markets, most especially the African ones, have no coverage in the mutual fund/ETF universe. General emerging market mutual funds typically have investment in only three or four of the region’s markets (South Africa, Egypt, Israel, and maybe one other). Of roughly $100 billion invested in emerging market funds, only about $28 million is invested in the smaller African markets. There are no other African regional funds available to US investors. There is one small ETF, SPRD S&P Emerging Middle East and Africa (GAF), but over 85% of its assets are invested in just two countries, Israel and South Africa. And so this will diversify your portfolio.

Second, you might be getting in on the ground floor of Something Big. It’s pretty clear that a lot of private investment money is flowing now into the region. The flagship might be the decision by Harvard’s endowment managers to quietly launch what they hope will become a billion dollar Middle East investment fund. Mohamed El-Erian, long-time PIMCO emerging markets manager and just-departed Harvard endowment manager, is quoted in the Financial Times (6/6/07) as saying "[i]n the economies of the GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] and North Africa you have enough going on to accelerate opening up of the investment management world, implying more sophisticated techniques, a broader set of players and greater opportunities." In the Middle East, the scope of those opportunities is suggested by the comparison of the region’s p/e ratio (13) with its earnings growth (20% per year). The figures for the US are a p/e of 16 and growth around 11%. So, if you’ve long wanted to invest like Harvard, here’s your chance.

But should you take it?

Chris Alderson, the fund’s lead manager, makes the case in a four-page report, forthrightly named "The Case for Investing in the Middle East and Africa."

Both the Middle East and Africa represent exciting opportunities for investors seeking diversification. While the regions vary in some respects, such as the wide variation in GDP per capita, they correspond in offering strong, structurally based economic growth and stock markets that are, for different reasons, relatively unfamiliar to outside investors. While not without risk, these frontier investment territories should deliver considerable rewards for a portfolio which can successfully identify the most attractive growth opportunities available.

Beyond the general case for Africa and the Middle East, one can make a case for T. Rowe Price funds in particular: their management is first rate, their regional offerings (Europe, Emerging Europe, Latin America, Japan, New Asia) are all somewhere between respectable and spectacular, Price has a strong corporate culture which centers on matching risk to return, their expenses are low, manager turnover is limited, and so on.

That needs to be balanced by a really clear grasp of some of the issues confronting investors in the region:


There are, in addition, regulatory challenges (governments may limit or prevent foreign stock ownership in some sectors of the economy) which are only gradually being overcome.

Bottom Line: The Harvard-like (or, better yet, Yale-like) returns are generated by going boldly where no one has gone before. That might mean buying forests when other folks are buying tech stocks, snatching up piles of possibly worthless securitized sub-prime loans at pennies on the dollar or being the first Western investor in a Zimbabwean corporation despite that economy’s 17,000% annual inflation rate. But before seeking those returns, keep two things in mind: (1) Harvard’s investment horizon is measured in centuries. And (2) Harvard is capable of absorbing enormous losses (e.g., the $350 million loss on their Sowood Capital investment) without noticeable discomfort. If your time horizon is somewhat shorter and your ability to absorb losses somewhat less, proceed with care (if at all), but take some comfort in the fact that Price offers about as reliable a guide as you’re able to find.

Fund website: http://www.troweprice.com/. Folks geeky enough to want a better understanding of the evolving Africa markets might read the Center for Global Development’s 2007 working paper entitled Why Doesn’t Africa Get More Equity Investment? I didn’t find anything comparable on the Middle East.

October 1, 2007

Update (posted February 1, 2009):

Assets: $230 million

Expenses: 1.75%

2008 return: (53.3%)

 

In isolation, it would be hard to find a more attractive portfolio than TRAMX’s.  The portfolio holds just 34 high growth, high yield stocks.  Very high growth: these companies should 40% annual sales growth and 18.3% long-term earnings growth.  By comparison, Mr. Heebner’s CGM Focus stocks can claim only 3% sales growth and 12.4% long-term earnings growth.  At the same time, the TRAMX stocks have a yield of 7.66%, about 50% above the Total Bond Market’s yield (all that per Morningstar and T Rowe Price, 1/6/09).  For all that growth and income, investors are asked to pay a relative pittance: T. Rowe puts its price/earnings ratio at 9.6. 

So why did the fund suck so atrociously in 2008?  It was a tale of two years: TRAMX was one of the best performing emerging markets funds through the first six months of 2008 (up more than 5% while emerging markets as a whole were down 12%) but from July 1 to the end of the year, the fund dropped by 55% (adjusted for distributions).   It ended the year trailing almost every emerging markets fund except its sibling, T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock (PRMSX) which lost over 60%.  (Naturally I’m invested in both though, in my defense, I substantially pared back my emerging markets funds in 2006 and again in 2007 to re-establish my 10% allocation to such stocks.)  Mr. Alderson was “shocked by the depth of the downturn and the speed at which the market environment deteriorated” (Annual Report, 15 November 2008).

Here’s the ugly detail:

 

July – September

October –December

2008

TRAMX

(28.6)

(37.9)

(53.3)

TRP Emerging Markets Stock

(30.2)

(34.2)

(60.5)

Vanguard Emerging Markets

(26.0)

(27.8)

(52.8)

WisdomTree Middle East Dividend

n/a

(31.9)

n/a

S&P Emerging Middle East & Africa

(16.9)

(18.5)

(39.5)

PowerShares MENA Frontier Countries

n/a

(35.2)

n/a

So what happened?  There appear to be two drivers of the collapse.  First, the fund is invested almost exclusively in Middle Eastern financial firms rather than other African stock markets.  Between them, Qatar, UAE, Egypt, Jordan, Oman, Kuwait, Lebanon and Bahrain constitute 90% of the portfolio.  Such markets were among the world’s weakest in 2008.  As I scanned the results of equity funds based in the Middle East and open only to Middle Eastern investors, losses during the second half of the year ran between 50% (Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank MSCI Arabian Markets Index Fund) and almost 80% (National Bank of Abu Dhabi Growth Fund).  The South African market, a centerpiece of most frontier market funds, was both stronger and largely absent here.

Second, the region suffered an entirely-predictable liquidity collapse.  I warned in the initial profile that “[m]uch of the money already invested in the region is ‘smart money’ . . . it comes from hedge funds and other highly leveraged investors. The combination of a small, illiquid market and substantial leverage is a recipe for really substantial short-term pain.”  Mr. Alderson, the manager, pointed to the flight of such investors in his September 08 commentary: “the global financial crisis prompted investors to become risk averse. In addition, speculative investors and hedge funds abandoned these regions as oil and commodity prices retreated and monetary authorities showed no signs that they were about to revalue their currencies.”

One additional fly in the ointment is Mr. Alderson’s scheduled departure at the end of March 2009.  He will become president of T. Rowe Price International and will remain on the fund’s advisory board.  His successor will be Joseph Rohm.  Mr. Rohm has been with the fund as an analyst since its inception.  He is a Vice President of T. Rowe Price International, a graduate of the University of Cape Town, and an African equities analyst since 2000.  In general, Price has handled such transitions very well.

So where does this leave us? The fund is, Mr. Alderson says, “attempting to benefit from strong regional growth primarily through financials. We also believe industrials [the portfolio’s second-largest sector] will benefit from massive infrastructure spending programs.”  I think of it as the Levi Strauss model: Strauss made a fortune selling supplies to gold miners in the 1840s rather than panning for gold himself.   Since any gains in Africa will likely be financed by Middle Eastern banks and will profit Middle Eastern industrial conglomerates, the fund holds those companies in preference to direct investment in sub-Saharan Africa (where they currently have only one holding outside of South Africa, a Nigerian bank).  Mr. Rohm’s various interviews with the media suggest that he would add rather aggressively to the fund’s sub-Saharan Africa holdings.  Such a move is not likely to dampen its volatility.

If a frontier markets fund made sense for your portfolio a year ago – which is to say, if you’ve got a long time horizon and are able to devote a few percent of your portfolio to outstandingly volatile – it makes no less, and probably a bit more, sense today.  While you might be tempted by the S&P Emerging Middle East & Africa (GAF) ETF’s substantially better 2008 performance, that fund invests almost exclusively in just two countries – Israel, which Price doesn’t even consider an “emerging market” at all, and South Africa. 

FundAlarm © 2007, 2009