Highlights and Commentary
By Roy Weitz
(Originally posted August 1, 1999)
[Archive Table of Contents]


Don't get caught by surprise: This month's FundAlarm database contains 617 funds that have been in existence at least three years, but less than five years.....By definition, none of these funds can be 3-ALARM, but that doesn't mean poor performance should be ignored.....The accompanying page lists all 617 of these funds, and highlights the worst (and best) funds in each benchmark category.....Among the funds that aren't yet 3-ALARM, but should be causing the greatest concern:

Large-cap:
- PBHG Core Growth (PBCRX)
- Smith Barney Contrarian B (SBMBX)
- Smith Barney Contrarian L (SBMCX)
- PBHG Select Equity (PBHEX)
- Smith Barney Contrarian A (SBMGX)
Mid-cap:
- Dreyfus Aggressive Growth (DGVAX)
- Lighthouse Contrarian (LGFTX)
- Merrill Lynch Growth C (MCQRX)
- Merrill Lynch Growth D (MDQRX)
- Seligman Frontier B (SLFBX)
Small-cap:
- Safeco Small Co Stock No Load (SFSCX)
- Liberty-CrabbeHuson Small Cap A (CHSCX)
- RS Partners (RSPFX)
- Oberweis Micro-Cap (OBMCX)
- Artisan Small Cap (ARTSX)
Balanced:
- Prudent Bear (BEARX)
- CitiSelect Folio 200 A (CFBAX)
- CitiSelect Folio 300 A (CFCAX)
- CitiSelect Folio 400 A (CFDAX)
- Smith Barney Conc Alloc Cons A (SBCPX)
International:
- Vontobel Eastern Euro Equity (VEEEX)
- Guinness Flight Asia Small Cap (GFASX)
- Lexington Small Cap Asia Gr (LXCAX)
- Warburg Pincus Emerg Mkt Com (WPEMX)
- Alliance All-Asia Investment B (AAABX)
Specialty:
- Gabelli Gold (GOLDX)
- RS Global Natural Res (RSNRX)
- Van Eck Global Hard Assets C (GHACX)
- Van Eck Global Hard Assets A (GHAAX)
- Franklin Natural Resources (FRNRX)

1-800-COOKIECUTTER: Richard Sapio is a former water-cooler salesman, bartender, and broker.....He is also the proprietor of 1-800-MUTUALS Inc.....Investors can make a toll-free call to Sapio's company, and one of his telephone consultants will help design a mutual fund portfolio.....For this service, Sapio charges a $375 set-up fee and a 1% annual maintenance fee, which also includes portfolio monitoring and "free annual rebalancing"*.....How good is Sapio's service?.....We took a look at his Web site (www.1800mutuals.com), and we weren't impressed.....The basic problem is lack of flexibility.....1-800-Mutuals offers only five pre-packaged portfolio allocations, and every investor is shoehorned into one of them, whether the investor belongs there or not.....For example, we created a profile for an extremely conservative retiree, and we used the "Investment Blueprint" feature on Sapio's Web site to request a recommended portfolio.....Even though our "retiree" said that she owned only certificates of deposit and money market funds, had no investment experience, and wanted a low-risk portfolio, she was directed to Sapio's "balanced" allocation, which looks like this:
How can we say this nicely?.....This is an absurd allocation for a conservative retiree -- 63% in stocks for someone who, as far as Sapio knows, has never owned a stock in her life.....We also tested Sapio's "Investment Blueprint" on the most aggressive investor we could dream up, with the following result:
All of Sapio's allocations are heavy on three types of sector funds (health care, technology, and financial services).....This second allocation isn't as wildly inappropriate as the preceding one.....But even for a young and aggressive investor, it leaves much to be desired, since it has no "core" holdings, and huge sectors of the economy are missing entirely.....Is it possible to streamline the process of selecting mutual funds?.....We believe it is, but 1-800-Mutuals isn't the answer.
* "Dial 1-800-Mutuals To Have Some Fund," Mara der Hovanesian, Dow Jones Newswires, July 8, 1999


StockJungle.com recently announced plans for a new series of mutual funds, including the StockJungle.com Community Intelligence Fund.....According to the registration statement, this fund will invest:
"in a diversified portfolio of [U.S.] common stocks...having market capitalizations of no less than $100 million and whose identity has been provided...by visitors to the StockJungle.com website...."
Your eyes are not deceiving you: The Community Intelligence Fund plans to build its portfolio around anonymous postings on a Bulletin Board.....Think about this for a moment.....If you had solid (and presumably legal) information about a company, why would you want to post that information on the Community Intelligence Bulletin Board?.....Because you love mankind, and you believe everyone should have a chance to get rich?.....Because your Mom always taught you to share?.....Or because you hope the Community Intelligence fund will buy the stock that you're writing about, which will drive the price up, which will make your holdings worth more money?.....Perhaps FundAlarm readers will be inspired by the first two noble motives, but we suspect that most people who post on the Community Intelligence Bulletin Board will be driven by the third one: financial gain.....So if you really want to make some money from this fund, forget about investing in it.....Just establish a reputation as a good tipster.....Buy the stock you're touting, preferably one that's thinly-traded (to stay out of trouble, don't forget to disclose your ownership interest).....Then sit back, let the fund push your stock's price higher, and sell out for a nice profit.....Think of it as Front-Running for the Common Man.


The Wonderful World of Work:

PositionJob PerformanceResult
Sales clerkFails to meet objective standards Possible discipline, cut in pay, or termination.
Corporate executiveFails to meet objective standards Possible discipline, cut in pay, or termination.
Mutual fund manager93% fail to meet objective standard (S&P 500) over previous three yearsMedian base salary of $144,500, up 10% from 1998. Median bonus of $133,000, up 22% from 1998.
Source: Managers Get Big Pay Despite So-So Showings, Pui-Wing Tam, The Wall Street Journal, July 20, 1999


The Sassy Dilemma: My dog, Sassy, likes to carry things around in her mouth.....When she's champing on a nylon bone, it seems like nothing could ever dislodge it.....But if I offer her a ball, she considers her options for a millisecond, and drops the bone like it's on fire.....Many mutual funds, especially growth funds, will soon face The Sassy Dilemma.....Under the new Lipper ratings, which go into effect this fall, it has been estimated that over half of all growth funds will see their relative performance ranking drop by at least one quartile.....But if these growth funds choose to classify themselves as "supergroup" funds -- and the choice is entirely theirs -- only 14% would see a one quartile drop, and 13% would actually move up a quartile.....Some cynical observers of the mutual fund scene believe that mutual funds will choose the Lipper category that makes them look best.....Steven "Pollyanna" Lipper, architect of the new Lipper rating system, disagrees: "Fund companies are a bit more intelligent about the public positioning of their funds. If they've been positioning their funds as growth funds all along, they're not going to suddenly switch".....Right....And if Sassy had a ball in her mouth, she'd refuse to drop it for a Beefy Burger.


Ways to lose money you probably don't even know about: We suspect that few mutual fund investors worry about "transaction costs".....But two recent articles highlight, once again, how small costs can add up*.....Transaction costs come in two basic varieties: Processing costs and market-impact costs.....Processing costs include things like broker commissions, fees, taxes, etc, and these are relatively easy to control.....Market-impact costs are more elusive, and beyond the experience of most individual investors.....For example, say XYZ stock is currently trading at $20 per share, and your fund manager expects it to increase to $25 within a year....If she places a large order at $20, and the market responds by pushing the price up $1 per share, the potential gain of 25% ($5/$20) is reduced to 19% ($4/$21).....In a study of 150 mutual funds from 1996-1998, the research firm Barra determined that PBHG Emerging Growth had the highest market-impact cost among small-caps, at 5.73%.....Among mid-caps, the market-impact leader was Dresdner RCM Growth Equity, at 5.23%.....Large-cap Phoenix Engemann Aggressive Growth led all funds, with an astounding market-impact cost of 8.13%.....How can an individual investor identify funds with high transaction costs?.....It's almost impossible.....Transaction costs are often associated with turnover, but two funds with the same high turnover rate can incur very different transaction costs, depending on how their managers control market impact.....We predict that you'll be reading a lot more about market-impact cost, and market-impact data should become more readily available.....In the meantime, it helps to remember this: Funds with 0% turnover have $0 of transaction costs.....The closer you can come to this ideal, the better.
* "Portfolio Manager's Style of Trading Skews Returns," The Wall Street Journal, Pui-Wing Tam, June 25, 1999;
"It's Gnawing at Your Fund, And Now It Has a Gauge," The New York Times, Carole Gould, July 11, 1999



Let's talk about EDGAR: If you were expecting a discussion about men in tutus, you've come to wrong place.....In this case, EDGAR stands for Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis & Retrieval.....EDGAR is a powerful tool that can help you retrieve most mutual fund documents filed with the SEC (annual reports, Statements of Additional Information, proxies, prospectuses).....But using EDGAR often takes patience, persistence, and savvy.
"It's mine!...No, it's mine!": When Ryan Jacob left the Internet Fund, he took with him one of the best short-term track records in mutual fund history.....Or did he?.....The SEC views performance records as belonging at least partly to the manager, while the NASD and many fund companies see them as belonging to the fund.....As things stand now, Jacob might be able to mention his track record in the prospectus for his new Internet fund, but NASD rules prohibit him from mentioning that same record in ads or on a Web site.....Most of the debate in this area centers around who owns a manager's record, and who can exploit it.....We'd like to propose a refreshingly simple solution: Declare that both parties own a departed manager's record, but also require that breaks in management tenure must be clearly indicated whenever performance results are presented.....If this were the rule, we suspect that fund companies would come up with more effective ways to keep managers from leaving, and managers would be less likely to succumb to happy feet.


Briefly noted:
[Top | Home]

FundAlarm © Roy Weitz, 1999