David Snowball's
New-Fund Page for April, 2008


[Open for business | Coming attractions | Stars in the shadows]


Dear friends,

With this issue, we celebrate (well, I celebrate . . . Roy’s still on the fence*) the end of my second year of writing for FundAlarm. Ahh, it seems like just 63,072,000 seconds ago that I was anxiously awaiting your response to the first installment of FundAlarm’s Annex. In celebration of the anniversary, our highlighted funds this month are all celebrating birthdays of their own: Al Frank Fund (VALUX) just reached 10, Sextant Core (SCORX) is celebrating its first birthday at the start of April, and the socially-responsible folks at Pax World have just delivered a new little bundle of joy into the equity-investing world.

* This is Roy, down from the fence, to thank David for his tremendous work. In the midst of an incredibly busy life, David has managed to produce consistently insightful, useful material, with good sense and good humor, "almost" always on time. We all owe David a big "thank you."

Finally some good news!

The rich people are taking it in the shorts, too! My sufferings always seem more bearable if I can image The Donald writhing in fiscal agony. The March 31st Dow Jones Hedge Fund Strategy benchmarks give a good indication of the limited success that even very rich investors have been achieving:

 

YTD*

TTM

Convertible arbitrage

0.5

(3.5)

Merger arbitrage

0.8

8.9

Event driven

1.4

0.8

Distressed securities

(0.5)

(8.4)

Market neutral

(0.2)

(0.5)

Long/short equity

1.9

7.9

In general, the hedge-like mutual funds that I follow – both those funds I’ve profiled and those who serve as de facto benchmarks – have held up pretty well:

 

YTD*

TTM

Permanent Portfolio

3.5

13.6

Hussman Strategic Growth

0.9

2.7

Arbitrage

(0.5)

4.4

New Century Alt Strategies

(1.8)

(8.2)

Leuthold Asset Allocation

(1.8)

6.8

Utopia Core

(2.7)

(0.2)

Merger

(3.8)

(3.4)

Nakoma Absolute Return

(5.2)

7.5

Wintergreen

(5.9)

10.4

Vanguard Total Stock Market

(10.0)

(6.1)

Conventional risk-management strategies have generally lost less than their equity exposure would suggest, but have had a bit rougher time making it into the black:

 

YTD*

TTM*

Fidelity Strategic Income

0.9

4.6

Fidelity Global Balanced

(3.9)

6.4

Mair & Power Balanced

(4.5)

(1.4)

Sextant Core

(4.7)

0.1

Buffalo Balanced

(5.2)

(1.4)

Vanguard Balanced Index

(5.2)

(0.6)

Bridgeway Balanced

(6.40)

(1.4)

Vanguard Global Equity

(11.5)

(4.2)

* Year-to-date as of March 28. ** TTM = trailing twelve months.

Frontier over-crowding, part II

In March I noted Fidelity’s impending launch of its Emerging Europe, Middle East, Africa fund with the prospect that billions of dollars would follow. The likelihood of "hot money" and, likely "dumb money" inflows grew substantially with the March 6, 2008 launch of a "frontier markets" index. Merrill Lynch’s Frontier Index will track 50 of the most liquid stocks in 17 frontier markets including Cyprus, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan and the UAE. The Wall Street Journal reports that had the index been in existence from January 2007 – March 2008, it would have returned 70%. A Merrill representative says that "frontier markets are as close as you get" to the holy grail of investing: a new, uncorrelated asset class. Merrill reports that "In frontier markets, during the period of February 2000 to December 2007, the monthly correlation of returns for the S&P 500 was 32 percent, compared to 73 percent for emerging markets and 96 percent for developed markets." Several sources report that Merrill has launched index-linked notes which would allow individuals or institutions (depending on the story being quoted) to buy shares of the index. I spoke with Elena Mehas, who does media relations for Merrill, and she begs to disagree. (Sources: "Merrill Starts a New ‘Frontier’ Index," WSJ, 6 March 2008 , and ml.com)

One week later, Harding, Loevner registered their Frontier Emerging Markets Fund. This will be an institutional fund ($1 million minimum) focusing on "frontier and smaller emerging markets." It may be that the fund will be available at a reduced minimum through one or another of the supermarkets. Harding, Loevner Emerging Markets, for example, has a $25,000 minimum but is available NTF through Fidelity or Schwab for $2,500. Likewise, Harding, Loevner Global has a $100,000 minimum, but $2,500 through Schwab.

It’s Zach-mania!

Because he’s Zachtastic!

For Zach Liggett (age 33), the sting of being denied a place on AllWomensTalk.com’s new list of "the 50 hottest men" has been partially offset by two other recent honors. The Utopia funds co-manager was recognized by Institutional Investor as one of the fund industry’s 20 rising stars. What appears to be a European arm of Institutional Investor published
a glossy report that looked for "up-and-coming mutual fund executives . . . who are likely to impact the investment management industry in the years to come." Unlike most such lists, this one included ten behind-the-scenes folks as well as ten talented, younger managers.

Liggett, whose Utopia Core fund was profiled here last year, predicts waves of fund consolidation as "much of our industry becom [es] increasingly commoditized." He described Utopia’s launch as a response to a situation in which affluent investors could access unconventional strategies while "smaller investors [were] still stuck with an over-supply of products . . . that usually has little to do with their long-term investment goals."

The other fund managers profiled are:

Eric Cinnamond (age 36)

Former co-CEO of Evergreen Asset Management and manager of the Intrepid Capital Small Cap Fund

Wayne Collette (38)

Columbia Technology Fund

Andrew Feltus (38)

Pioneer Global High Yield

Pioneer High Yield

Tim Fidler (37)

Ariel Focus (ARRFX)

Cory Gilchrist (37)

Marsico 21st Century and Marsico Global

Manind Govil (35)

RS Core Equity

Monem Salam (35)

Director of Islamic Investing and deputy portfolio manager for Amana Growth and Amana Income. Saturna, which advises the Amana funds, also advises the Sextant funds. Sextant Core (SCORX) is profiled below.

Alejandro Vallecillo (39)

Allegiant Mid-Cap Value

Jason Weiner (38)

Fidelity Growth Discovery and its various clones.

Along with several other FundAlarm alumni, Zach Liggett and the Utopia funds were also recognized in Aaron Pressman’s "Contrarians to Watch" article in the March 27th issue of Business Week. Pressman promised "a highly subjective list of managers who go their own way to outdo their rivals." Somewhere in here, Pressman hoped, one might get a lead on "the next Ken Heebner."

Skipping lightly over the existence of the other two managers (Suzanne Stepan and company founder Paul Sutherland), Pressman writes, "After identifying big global themes, like the growing need for clean water, Liggett narrows his focus to a few stocks that best embody the trend." Utopia can short stocks and they’re currently looking for "the frothiest solar play to bet again." Zach’s description of the solar market is "completely irrational."

Pressman’s other three potentially-great, independent thinkers (more properly, teams of thinkers) are:

Corydon Gilchrist

Marsico Global

Kent, Gordon and Russell Croft

Croft Value (CLVFX)

Dan Pickett, Mark Fedenia

Nakoma Absolute Return (NARFX)

Fidelity makes big money. For Fidelity.

All the reorganizations that took place at Fidelity in 2007 have made a difference to the company's bottom line. The Boston Globe's Ross Kerber reports that in a letter to shareholders of Fidelity's parent company FMR, Ned Johnson attributed a 22 percent rise in pre-tax income for 2007 to improved mutual fund performance and the aforementioned reorg. The company made $2.2 billion in 2007, compared with $1.8 billion in 2006. Which is, according to Morningstar’s fund family data, exactly twice what its average investor made in the same year. And I’m guessing it hasn’t dropped by 12% in the first couple months of 2008.

It’s good to be in charge. ("Fidelity’s income rises 22% in ’07," Boston Globe, 29 February 2008)

The Minimum Return Fund, on the other hand, isn’t making money for anyone.

Back in November 2007, I gently poked at the ineptly-named Minimum Return fund:

From the Department of "Did They Even Talk With the Marketing Department?"
Here’s a marketing idea for the ages: highlight your poverty. The newly-launched Minimum Return Fund will "seek capital growth while seeking to preserve initial invested capital and provide a minimum return during the Guarantee Period." I guess it’s better than The Barely Adequate Fund or The Lightly-Disguised Bad Idea Fund, but not by a lot.

As it turns out, "newly-launched" was a tad optimistic on my part. The fund’s advisors have delayed its launch six times over the past six months. Here’s the saga of Post-Effective Amendments Nos. 69, 76, 80, 81, 82 and 83:

Post-Effective Amendment No. 69 (the "Amendment") was filed pursuant to Rule 485(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933 on September 28, 2007 and pursuant to Rule 485(a)(2) would become effective on December 12, 2007.

Post-Effective Amendment No. 76 was filed pursuant to Rule 485(b)(1)(iii) on December 7, 2007 for the sole purpose of extending the date upon which the Amendment was to become effective to January 11, 2008.

Post-Effective Amendment No. 80 was filed pursuant to Rule 485(b)(1)(iii) for the sole purpose of designating January 31, 2008 as the new date upon which the Amendment shall become effective.

Post-Effective Amendment No. 81 was filed pursuant to Rule 485(b)(1)(iii) for the sole purpose of designating February 25, 2008 as the new date upon which the Amendment shall become effective.

Post-Effective Amendment No. 82 was filed pursuant to Rule 485(b)(1)(iii) for the sole purpose of designating March 26, 2008 as the new date upon which the Amendment shall become effective.

This Post-Effective Amendment No. 83 is being filed pursuant to Rule 485(b)(1)(iii) for the sole purpose of designating April 25, 2008 as the new date upon which the Amendment shall become effective.

Is it possible that the universe is trying to send the Minimum Returnees a message?

Drip, drip, drip

Janus announced two more resignations this month. Andy Iseman, chief operating officer of Janus Capital, and president and CEO of Janus Funds, will leave in early April. Daniel Kozlowski, co-manager of the Janus Adviser Long/Short Fund (JALSX – a billion in assets and a 3.45% expense ratio) has already departed. While neither departure qualified as "news" on Janus’s website, the appointment of three distinguished new board members did. Janus added a former Morningstar managing director (Tim Armour), a former president of the CFA Institute (Jeffrey Diermeier) and Georgetown University’s chief investment office (Lawrence Kochard). The Janus board has 14 members, 12 of whom are independent.

Jim Oberweis’s saga of electoral futility adds a chapter.

Oberweis, founder and chairman of the Oberweis funds (though no longer a manager) and former editor of the Oberweis Report, ran yet again for elected office. He was running to complete the unexpired term of former House Speaker Dennis Hastert. In what the Chicago Tribune describes as "a stunning upset," Oberweis last month lost the seat in a long-time Republican district to a political novice (a retired Fermilab physicist). It’s not clear why folks would be stunned by the outcome since this is Oberweis’s fourth high-profile loss in the last six years. He’d previously been defeated in his attempts to gain the Republican nomination for a U.S. Senate seat from Illinois in 2002 and 2004, and for the Republican nomination for Governor of Illinois in 2006.

Oberweis has a track record for making peculiar public choices. In 2002 he compared pro-life politicians to the Taliban. In 2004 he was fined $21,000 by the Federal Election Commission for a commercial for his dairy that ran which the FEC found violated federal election laws. In 2006 his campaign used made-up newspaper headlines in commercials attacking his Republican rival. And, in 2008, he used made-up families in mailers attacking his Republican rival and was caught on-tape mocking his Democratic opponent’s slow and halting speech. The election ended with Oberweis suing the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democrats filing Federal election law violation charges with the FEC.

And he promises to do it all over again in November!

Briefly noted: The Kinetics Internet Emerging Growth fund (WWWEX) is being repackaged as the Kinetics Global fund, which will "invest in the equity securities of companies whose research and development efforts may result in higher stock values.  These companies may be large, medium or small in size." The fund has $3 million in assets, but an entirely reasonable track record for a tech fund. They’re also adding loaded and institutional share classes.

Warren Isabelle and his co-manager have arranged to buy back control of its Ironwood Isabelle Small Co Stock (IZZYX – formerly ICM/Isabelle Small Cap Value) from its corporate parent, MB Investment Partners & Associates, LLC. IZZYX has $25 million in assets between two share classes, a drop of two-thirds in the past four years. Its launch was eagerly anticipated because Mr. Isabelle had a great track record at Pioneer, offered low expenses and a low minimum investment, and promised to close the fund when it reached $500 million in assets. The fund never reached $100 million.

FBR Small Cap Technology (FBRCX) is being repackaged as FBR Small Cap Growth while FBR Large Cap Technology (FBRTX) becomes FBR Technology. Small Cap Tech had a pretty undistinguished record and drew only $4 million in assets. FBR Large Cap Technology has a pretty solid record (four-star, somewhat above-average returns) and $28 million. The managers all remain.

The behemoth CREF Stock Account, a $134 billion variable annuity, has announced its decision to increase its allocation to foreign equities and to add exposure to foreign small caps. The new allocation targets will be 70 to 75% US, 25 to 30% foreign, with about 5% emerging markets and 3% international small caps. CREF Social Choice, a balanced account, is gradually moving 13% of its portfolio into international stocks.

William Blair Global Growth moved up its launch date to March 26, 2008.

RIP: Brill’s Mutual Funds Interactive (1/13/1995 – 3/9/2008)

Rob and Marla Brill "came to the Web looking for personal finance information and didn't see much content [beyond] flashy technology looking for substance, or the product of corporate communications or marketing departments interested more in generating business than giving Web visitors much helpful information." Their new website featured a remarkably active and lively discussion board (regular participants included Bridgeway founder John Montgomery, Efficient Frontier Advisors founder Bill Bernstein, E*Trade’s vice president for mutual funds Brian Murray, and an eclectic band of retail investors) and a fair amount of original content. It was quickly recognized as one of the web’s premier finance sites.

The Brill site was shuttered last month, victim of falling revenues and vanishing readership. The readership decline was linked, in part, to the changing nature of the web: it has become increasingly difficult for "mom and pop" sites to attract attention amidst the plethora of blogs and huge corporate sites. The Brills' decline was precipitated several years ago by a vitriolic, poorly-handled fight on the discussion board. A portion of the Brill readership left to found a competing discussion board for folks interested in actively trading their funds (a movement that was ridiculed at the time, but seems now to be just a precursor to ETF trading) and many migrated to FundAlarm and the FundAlarm Discussion Board. Somewhere in there, the Brill board seems to have lost its critical mass, and traffic slowly drained away.

The Brills' plight reminds me of how very grateful I am for FundAlarm – for the active, insightful, always-civil and oft-genial discussion board, for Ted’s indefatigable efforts, for the daily renewal of their commitment to intelligent discourse by the dozen or so folks who are always there when the rest of the community is seeking guidance, but most especially for Roy’s leadership and on-going underwriting of the site. He is, and you are, one and all, gems.

Since it’s tax rebate and "economic stimulus payments" season, you might consider a gesture of support for FundAlarm. You can make a direct contribution using Amazon’s honor system or you can buy pretty much anything through Amazon and help support the site. The details, as always, are here. If it’s tax-payment, rather than tax-rebate, season, perhaps you should visit the Discussion Board and have some tax-efficient fund ideas vetted for you.

Keep those cards and letters coming. Roy and I are always fascinated to read your insights, suggestions and criticisms. Here’s the link.

As ever,

David




Open for business: These funds have already begun accepting investments.


NEW Discussed this month:
Pax World Global Green Fund: In keeping with our birthday theme, we'd like to welcome a bouncing new bundle o' fund joy, Pax World's Global Green Fund. Prospects here look bright since the creators, both Pax and Britain's Impax, are wonderful, experienced parents.
Sextant Core (SCORX) just celebrated its first birthday! Congratulations, little fella. The good news for investors is that Core largely incorporates the portfolios of Sextant’s four other, very solid funds.

[top]




Coming Attractions: These are funds that have filed a prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission, but won't be available for purchase for a while. We'll keep an eye on these funds, and discuss the more interesting of them at length as their opening date draws nearer.

Manning & Napier Target (2010, 2020, 2030, 2040, 2050 and Income) funds are funds of M&N funds. The funds will be managed by M&N’s Senior Research Group. The most aggressive funds will hold between 70 - 95% in equities while the Income fund will hold 5 – 35%. Expenses vary by share class. The "K" class shares are open to individual investors. Minimum investment is $2000 and expenses are around 1.15%, including the expenses of the underlying funds. These appear to be available now.


Merk Asian Hard Currency Fund seeks to protect against the depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to Asian currencies. (Jim Rogers would be so pleased.) They’ll do that by investing in "high quality, short-term money market instruments denominated in Asian currencies or a combination of U.S. dollar denominated securities and forward currency contracts." The fund will be managed by Axel Merk, president of the adviser and its Swiss predecessor. Minimum investment of $2500, $1000 for an IRA or accounts with an automatic investing provision. Expenses capped at 1.3%.


Schwab Monthly Income Funds (Moderate, Enhanced and Maximum Payout) seek to provide current income and, as a secondary investment objective, capital appreciation by investing in a combination of Schwab and Laudus Funds. Like other "income replacement" funds (e.g. From Fido and Vanguard), these funds target a particular, sustainable drawdown rate: Moderate Payout Fund: 3-4%; Enhanced Payout Fund: 4-5%; and Maximum Payout Fund: 5-6%. The fraction of their portfolios in stock is negatively correlated to their payout: Maximum payout is 5-25% stock, Enhanced is 10-40%, and Moderate is 20-60% with the remainder in bonds and money markets. Managed by Jeffrey Mortimer, Schwab’s chief investment officer, Kimon Daifotis, chief fixed-income investment officer, and Caroline Lee, a Schwab portfolio manager. Expenses from 0.6 – 0.75%, $100 minimum investment but access is limited to folks working with a financial advisory or through a retirement plan.


Turner Core Growth 130/30 Fund seeks absolute returns through long-term capital appreciation. The plan is for the fund to hold 60 – 80 securities long, ranging from 80% to 130% of the value of its net assets and 20 - 25 securities short, ranging from 1% to 30% of the value of its net assets. As a result, the fund will be net long. It targets companies with market caps in the range of the S&P 500. The managers warn of "very high" price volatility. It began operation as a limited partnership in April 2007. The fund is managed by a team led by Robert Turner with co-managers Jason Schrotberger and David Honold. Expense ratio of 1.35%, $2500 minimum investment, $2000 for an IRA and $1000 for a plan with an automatic investment provision.


Turner Quantitative Broad Market Equity Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing in mid- and large cap (> $300 million) growth stocks. The fund uses a "proprietary quantitative model" to find 75 – 90 stocks which "exhibit characteristics that are predictive of future share price out performance." It can invest in US stocks and foreign stocks via ADRs. The Fund commenced operations in January, 2005 as a limited partnership. It is managed by David Kovacs and Damian Petrone. Expense ratio 0.89%, $2500 minimum investment, $2000 for an IRA and $1000 for a plan with an automatic investment provision.


William Blair Emerging Leaders Growth Fund (Institutional shares) invests in a diversified portfolio of emerging markets equity securities issued by companies with a market capitalization of at least $5 billion, although the fund also has the right to invest in IPOs and private placements. Managed by Jeffrey Urbina, who also manages or co-manages William Blair International Small Cap Growth and William Blair Emerging Markets Growth. Minimum investment is $5 million but it may be possible to buy retail quantities through a fund supermarket which will aggregate the accounts. Expenses capped at 1.4%

[top]





Stars in the shadows (funds that perhaps you should have noticed, but haven't): These are mostly tiny funds, already open (some for quite a while), whose achievements far outstrip their public presence. Why? In many cases, these will be funds offered by institutional money managers as a sideline. They're often created to benefit their clients' (or their own) employees. Such fund managers have no incentive to solicit huge inflows, tend not to charge marketing fees, and often absorb much of the cost of running these little funds into their own overhead. As a result, stars-in-the-shadows funds often offer average investors affordable access to the services of high-powered institutional or other private account managers. While these funds aren't guaranteed winners, their unique role in their sponsoring firms gives them a leg up.


NEW Discussed this month:
Al Frank Fund (VALUX): Do you suppose the manager of a successful fund, which just turned ten, and which is based on a successful newsletter, which recently turned 30, might be getting a little tired of living in the shadow of a sardonic liberal comedian with a really bad ‘do? (Just repeat to yourself: "Al Frank, RIP, is not Al Franken.")
[top]






FundAlarm © 2008